![current expert choice version current expert choice version](https://i2.wp.com/karanpc.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/InvoiceExpertAdvanced.jpg)
Asked his estimation for an “ETA,” he responds: “Prosecutors would not ‘lock in’ Gaetz’s ex-girlfriend’s testimony before the grand jury unless they were getting close to wrapping up their investigation and expected that investigation to result in an indictment,” Mariotti explains. Attorney, Harry Litman, says “given what we know from buddy Greenberg about his MO,” the Florida Congressman’s ex-girlfriend “could provide very damning testimony.”įormer federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti is even more definitive.
![current expert choice version current expert choice version](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Eewq7PiWsAAd8vx.jpg)
Attorney Joyce Vance, the well-known NBC News/MSNBC legal analyst and law professor adds, “Matt Gaetz seems to be moving closer to being indicted-locking in the girlfriend’s testimony under oath before the grand jury is a critical step.”Īnother former U.S. “Significant,” says former FBI Assistant Director Frank Figliuzzi, now an NBC News National Security Contributor. “Expect some public drama from Gaetz,” he warns.įormer U.S. Under a possible deal, she would avoid prosecution for obstruction of justice in return for testifying in the investigation into whether Gaetz in 2017 had sex with a 17-year-old female for money and whether months later he and others violated a federal law prohibiting people for paying for prostitutes overseas.”īased on the NBC News report legal experts are saying it’s likely time is running out for Gaetz. Gaetz’s ex-girlfriend “has been in talks for months with prosecutors about an immunity deal. NBC News’ Marc Caputo reports this is “a major development that suggests the Department of Justice may be moving closer to indicting him.”
![current expert choice version current expert choice version](https://s.getwinpcsoft.com/screenshots/2854/2854898_1.jpg)
of Justice after an NBC News report reveals his ex-girlfriend testified before a grand jury in his ongoing sex trafficking probe Wednesday and is in talks for an immunity deal. Matt Gaetz (R-FL) is likely to be facing a good deal of trouble from the Dept. Legal experts, including former federal prosecutors, appear in agreement that U.S. 6 committee, and one that like Cheney’s comments last month suggests a specific investigative target - a target that, if actually substantiated, would involve the potential for a criminal referral to the Justice Department.” “Either way, it’s a notable suggestion from the Jan.
![current expert choice version current expert choice version](https://static.macupdate.com/screenshots/85922/m/label-expert-screenshot.png)
“Perhaps, like the others, McCarthy simply decided Trump was there to stay and that it was time to adjust accordingly,” the Post reports. 6 commentary in a more Trump-friendly direction.” Noting that Trump has a history of borderline witness tampering, the Post adds that McCarthy isn’t the only Republican “to adjust his Jan. Liz Cheney (R-WY), who serves as vice chair of the committee, appeared on Fox News and confirmed that McCarthy’s meeting with Trump raised questions of witness tampering, without providing any detail. However, McCarthy also acknowledged that if such a conversation had occurred between him and Trump, it would constitute witness tampering.Ī few weeks later, Rep. McCarthy denied that he had any such conversation with Trump in an interview with Fox News last April. READ MORE: Jake Tapper openly mocks Trump supporters’ new Capitol riot conspiracy theory: ‘Not exactly a Mensa group’ “A few months later, though, McCarthy was talking as if Trump’s response once the riot began was sufficient.” 6, McCarthy blamed Trump for his tardy response to the attack on the Capitol and even suggested a historic censure of Trump,” the Post reports. Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), the House Select Committee investigating the insurrection noted that the minority leader’s view of Trump’s role in the insurrection “shifted over time, eventually becoming much more favorable to the former president,” the Washington Post reports. 6.īut in its Wednesday letter requesting testimony from Rep. Until now, much of the focus has been on whether Trump and/or his allies corruptly tried to obstruct an official proceeding - Congress’ counting of electoral votes on Jan. Former president Donald Trump may be facing a new avenue of potential criminal exposure in the Captiol riot probe.